FRANKFORT — When the House last week passed a “technical budget clean up” bill, Rep. Addia Wuchner, R-Burlington, had the best line:
“I thought we were broke,” Wuchner said during the floor debate.
If Wuchner was confused (who wouldn’t be?) she must be forgiven. After all, the budget bill the House was “cleaning up” was a combination of cigarette and alcohol tax increases and spending cuts to cover a projected $456 million budget shortfall.
During that debate, sponsors and leadership warned lawmakers they might face an even larger shortfall in the next fiscal year which begins July 1. Some of them were already talking about a special session this summer and a push by backers of electronic slots at race tracks to pass that legislation to produce more state money without still more new taxes.
But here was the House, passing a bill which authorized new school construction – of indisputably dilapidated elementary schools, but some of which are very small and which the Kentucky Department of Education thinks should be consolidated into larger, more cost-effective schools.
Some are located in counties which exert the minimum required local tax effort. House Speaker Greg Stumbo, D-Prestonsburg, pointed out that all are elementary schools rated in the worst condition in the state. They had been slated for replacement six years ago, and the children in those schools deserved safe, modern facilities, he said. But in one instance – Metcalfe County – Rep. Jamie Comer, R-Tompkinsville who represents the county, openly proclaimed he hoped to see the bill amended in the Senate to allow that district to use the money to build, not an elementary school, but a middle school.
The bill contained money for a worthy mobile clinic in eastern Kentucky. But Jimmie Lee, D-Elizabethtown, noted that there were at least 200 such worthy but unfunded needs, so why was this one included in a “clean up” bill? And several disgruntled lawmakers noted that project and all the schools were generally in the eastern part of the state, from where three of the House leadership hail.
It contained an appropriation that was difficult to oppose – funding for public defenders who have warned the courts they will run out of money before the end of the fiscal year and won’t be able to provide legal counsel to some indigent defendants. But Rep. Brad Montell, R-Shelbyville, took to the floor to argue the case of put upon prosecutors and demand equal funding for them. Prosecutors, county and commonwealth attorneys, have seen their budgets cut. Some are furloughing staff. But they’re not out of money. The public defenders will soon be tapped out, their budgets down to zero.
During the debate, several critics of the spending complained projects were slipped in “behind closed doors,” after leadership had said there were to be no new projects in the face of the dire fiscal crisis confronting the state. And a couple noted that new leadership had promised a “broader, more open process” when they sought to replace the previous regime. (To be fair, others had a point when they pointed out they’d been locked out of such deliberations under the leadership team of previous Speaker Jody Richards, D-Bowling Green.)
In the end, the bill passed easily. But it wasn’t hard to understand Wuchner’s confusion. “I thought we were broke.”
So did I.
Ronnie Ellis writes for CNHI News Service and is based in Frankfort, Ky. He may be contacted by email at rellis@cnhi.com.
Opinion
‘I thought we were broke’
- Opinion
-
-
Americans need to change attitudes
There’s something inherently wrong with this country’s societal standards when a mother is harassed and humiliated for breastfeeding her child in public, while any partial or complete display of the same woman’s breasts in the media or on the street for the purpose of sexual objectification would seem acceptable to many Americans, male and female alike.
-
Near miss on super prediction
Let’s take a step into the past my seven faithful readers and review some predictions made in this space in early September. (Too bad it wasn’t late September and we could borrow the line “should be back in school.”)
-
Redistricting plans equally indefensible
I don’t know how Franklin Circuit Judge Phillip Shepherd will rule in the re-districting case. Nor am I a constitutional attorney, so I can’t say with any authority the maps drawn by the Democratic controlled House to benefit Democrats or the one drawn by the Republican Senate to benefit Republicans are constitutional.
-
Comer sets good example
Newly elected Ag Commissioner Jamie Comer, a Gamaliel Republican, requested an audit of the department upon his taking the position earlier this month.
-
Fortis will be good partner
I put shoulder to the wheel in search of photos Thursday morning. First, there was an ancient bread van parked amongst some saplings on the side of which there was a woman’s name painted in white, puffy letters. Whose van might that be and I wonder if it comes with the for sale property?
-
Farewell to Gatewood
As word spread of Gatewood Galbraith’s passing, the same phrase was heard repeatedly: “Gatewood was a colorful character.”
-
Computers should make records easier to get
The digital revolution was supposed to make record-keeping easier and less costly for companies. Therefore it should make things simpler for the public or news outlets seeking open records to find them.
-
Resolutions for the new year
New Year’s is the time for resolutions, a lot of which won’t last until spring.
-
Things to rejoice this Christmas
The year that will soon lapse has been tough. It has been a year of immovable politics; a year of contentious state elections; a year of absurd gesticulations by certain fiscal court members.
- YOUR VIEWS: Remember Christ’s birth
- More Opinion Headlines
-
Americans need to change attitudes






