FRANKFORT — No one wants to oppose a bill to protect victims of domestic violence – especially lawmakers after one of their former colleagues was charged with murder of a woman who’d sought court protection from him.
“Amanda’s Bill,” sponsored by House Speaker Greg Stumbo, D-Prestonsburg, quickly sailed through the House but is encountering questions from judges who will have to administer the law – and others – as it is debated in the Senate. The bill would allow judges to require respondents in civil domestic abuse cases to wear GPS tracking devices which will allow authorities to track their movements wherever they go.
But district and family court judges – who hear the vast majority of such cases – testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday about concerns about the cost, the administration and even the constitutionality of the bill. Committee Chair Sen. Tom Jensen, R-London, said 18 states use the devices but all for criminal cases, none for civil cases.
“It appears at first blush it may not pass constitutional muster if you’re tracking every movement,” said Jefferson County Judge Patricia Walker Fitzgerald. She said most cases involve claims and counterclaims by only two people, without corroborating evidence and her decisions are based upon a lower standard of proof than in a criminal case.
Clay County Judge Gene Clark said the devices may not operate effectively in his county which does not have cell phone coverage, a fear shared by Pike County Family Court Judge Larry Thompson. Thompson is president of the Circuit Judge Association and said he’s received more than 100 calls from judges across the state expressing concerns about the legislation. Their fears ranged from the costs, how to administer an assessment of alleged perpetrators’ potential to commit violent acts against their accusers, and restrictions on the liberty and movement of people who haven’t been convicted of a crime.
Stumbo later said he’d met with judges and isn’t bothered by their concerns, saying he’s not opposed to tweaking the bill to meet those concerns.
“Obviously we want to give them something that works,” Stumbo said. “It’s a tool for them to use, and if they don’t use it, it won’t do any good.”
Nor, he said, is he worried those concerns might sidetrack passage of the bill in the Senate. “I’m confident it will pass,” Stumbo said.
All who spoke about the bill in Thursday’s committee hearing went out of their way to say they support the intent of the bill and generally support it. Some of the female judges who spoke about problems they see as judges revealed they had been victims of abuse themselves.
Judge Susan Johnson, whose district covers Johnson, Lawrence and Martin counties, said she was once held at gunpoint by a boyfriend.
“I am here today because he didn’t pull the trigger and he let me go,” Johnson said. “I can assure you I understand the importance of protection for the victim.”
Judge Linda Armstrong’s voice wavered as she told the committee she’d been the victim of abuse and even date rape as a young, single lawyer, something until now she’d never told her husband.
“We’re all in favor of a bill that protects victims of domestic violence,” she said. “I want to make (the bill) so we have a bullet proof bill.”
Jensen said the committee plans additional hearings on the bill, but the aim is to improve it so it doesn’t run afoul of constitutional protections and costs to counties. He said his committee plans to hear from vendors of the GPS devices, law enforcement, and perhaps even a constitutional law expert. But he thinks some version of the bill will pass this session of the legislature.
RONNIE ELLIS writes for CNHI News Service and is based in Frankfort. Reach him at rellis@cnhi.com. Follow CNHI News Service stories on Twitter at www.twitter.com/cnhifrankfort.
State News
Judges raise concerns about provisions of domestic violence bill
- State News
-
-
It’s back to the drawing board for legislators
Confusion reigns in the wake of a judge’s ruling that state redistricting maps passed by the General Assembly are unconstitutional. That ruling said until the legislature offers a plan that meets constitutional muster, 2012 candidates for the legislature must run in the districts drawn 10 years ago.
-
Pending redistricting ruling overshadows legislative business
It has been hurry up and wait this week in Frankfort. With everyone waiting to learn if a Franklin Circuit Judge will throw out the legislature’s plan to re-draw legislative districts and a hold on the filing deadline for fall elections, lawmakers are watching the calendar and court docket more closely than that day’s orders.
-
ELLIS UPDATE: Lawmakers closer on new district mapping
Democratic House Speaker Greg Stumbo said Thursday that lawmakers in the Republican Senate and Democratic House are close to an agreement on re-drawing the congressional district map.
-
UK, UL leaders: Cuts are hurting higher ed
The presidents of the University of Kentucky and the University of Louisville told a legislative panel that they will keep working to achieve the goals of higher education reform passed in 1997 in spite of on-going budget cuts. But they made it clear it won’t be easy.
-
Lawmakers closer on new district mapping
Democratic House Speaker Greg Stumbo said Thursday that lawmakers in the Republican Senate and Democratic House are close to an agreement on re-drawing the congressional district map.
-
Stumbo files anti-pill mill bill
Under provisions of a bill filed Thursday in the General Assembly, pain clinics would have to be owned by licensed health care practitioners and any health care professional who prescribes controlled substances would have to register with and utilize the state’s electronic tracking system.
-
Jill York files to run against Rocky Adkins
The new legislative district maps prompted some tough decisions by some key lawmakers – even before the new map and Tuesday’s filing deadline were cast into doubt by a Franklin Circuit Court restraining order.
-
Filing deadline extended for congressional races
While attorneys argued before a judge about the constitutionality of the state legislative redistricting plan, the General Assembly has extended the filing deadline for congressional races — because lawmakers can’t agree on a map for congressional districts.
-
GOP files suit over new state districts
Three Republican lawmakers and two private citizens filed suit Thursday in Franklin Circuit Court to have the House legislative redistricting plan declared unconstitutional.
-
Committee reviews pill mill bill
Just one day after state and federal law enforcement officials raided a Paintsville pain clinic for the second time in a year, a Senate committee Thursday began reviewing a bill to regulate such clinics.
- More State News Headlines
-
It’s back to the drawing board for legislators






