FRANKFORT — Lawmakers on the Interim Joint Committee on Local Government hammered Corrections Commissioner LaDonna Thompson with questions. Why hadn’t the Department of Corrections implemented more of the recommendations for county jails in a review by state Auditor of Public Accounts Crit Luallen?
Thompson had to be a bit surprised. The key recommendation of the now four-year-old jails study is that the state assume control of the jails. Thompson can’t effect that change. It would require the legislature to do so. And the audit was of jails, not the state system operated by Thompson.
One lawmaker praised Kentucky’s jail system as a model. He apparently hasn’t thoroughly read Luallen’s report or visited some of the lockups where inmates sleep on the floor in cells so crowded they barely have room to turn around. Studies by University of Kentucky Law Professor Dr. Robert Lawson – and a series of stories by CNHI News Service two years ago - detailed some of the substandard conditions in county jails.
Those stories also documented the pressures jail expenses place on county budgets. They reviewed Lawson’s studies of the exponential rise in inmate populations – and costs – although the crime rate remained stable while lawmakers passed bills to criminalize more behavior and to lengthen sentences.
Sen. Julian Carroll, D-Frankfort, suggested still more state prisoners be housed in jails because – at least on paper – jails can do it more cheaply. On average, it costs about $19,000 a year to house an inmate in a state facility and only $11,000 in county jails. But part of the difference is the nature of those incarcerated in the two systems. County jails don’t have maximum security prisoners, those suffering catastrophic illness or severe psychiatric problems. They are frequently understaffed with poorly trained and under paid staff. Nor do jails offer programs which might lessen chances inmates will commit more crimes upon release.
The financial data don’t account for the different living conditions, either. Maybe criminals shouldn’t expect to live in comfort, but there is a minimal standard which reflects as much on society as it does on inmates’ criminal responsibility. And lawmakers refuse to address their role in the problem. Behavior which 30 years ago produced calls to parents or small fines can now put minor drug offenders in jail for years because of harsher and harsher penalties passed by the lawmakers who campaign on promises to “get tough on crime.”
Vince Lang, executive director of the County Judge/Executives Association, which supports state takeover of jails and has pursued more state funding for jails through litigation, and Michael Foster, Christian County attorney and president of the Kentucky Association of Counties, cut to the bottom line.
“They’re broke so they’re looking to the jails to solve the problem and the jails and counties are going broke too,” Lang said. “One way to (solve the counties’ jail problem) is for the state to take over the system but you don’t have the money to do it,” Foster told the lawmakers.
They don’t. They also don’t have the resolve or the intellectual honest to tell the public we can’t keep sending more and more people to jail for minor drug offenses without foregoing other funding needs like education and infrastructure improvements. They won’t consider recommendations to re-visit persistent felony laws which produce lengthy prison terms disproportionate to the crime.
But lawmakers at least ought to lighten up on the people whose job is to administer the system lawmakers created.
RONNIE ELLIS writes for CNHI News Service and is based in Frankfort. Reach him at rellis@cnhi.com. Follow CNHI News Service stories on Twitter at www.twitter.com/cnhifrankfort.
State News
RONNIE ELLIS: Policymakers, not administrators, created jails problems
- State News
-
-
EVENING UPDATE: Supreme Court: Lawmakers to run in old districts
Legislative candidates will have to run in decade-old districts in this year’s elections, the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled Friday afternoon.
-
Stivers withdraws pseudoephedrine bill
In a move that surprised both supporters and opponents, the sponsor of a bill to require prescriptions for medications containing pseudoephedrine withdrew the bill in the state Senate Thursday.
-
Gambling talk, cold medicine dominates week
First it was redistricting which dominated every conversation in the 2012 General Assembly. Lawmakers couldn’t resolve that issue and it’s now before the state Court of Appeals which is expected to seek to transfer the case to the state Supreme Court.
-
Drug bill clears committee
It took some blunt testimony and visual evidence and the vote was close, but the Senate Judiciary Committee passed out a bill Thursday to require prescriptions for the purchase of products containing pseudoephedrine.
-
Senate committee looks at constables
A state Senate committee revised a proposed constitutional amendment which would have eliminated the office of constable Wednesday, choosing instead to offer a statute to allow local governments to define constables’ duties through ordinance.
-
Medicaid managed care groups reassure committee
Medicaid managed care organizations went before a restive Senate committee whose members have been bombarded with complaints from providers about late payments for Medicaid services.
-
Gambling amendment introduced
Gov. Steve Beshear and Republican Sen. Damon Thayer on Tuesday announced the much anticipated gambling amendment they hope to push through the legislature, an amendment that would allow up to seven casinos, five at existing horse racing tracks.
-
Activists gather to protest mountaintop removal
Their message was clear, though not everyone agrees with it.
-
Kentucky pharmacists unhappy with rates
A roomful of Kentucky pharmacists Monday made clear their dissatisfaction with some of their reimbursement rates under the newly implemented Medicaid managed care system before a legislative committee.
-
LRC appeals to Supreme Court
A lawyer for the governing arm of the state legislature has filed an appeal asking the state Supreme Court to dissolve a Franklin Circuit Court temporary injunction that 2012 candidates for the legislature run under 2002 district lines and set aside its ruling that the new district lines passed this year are unconstitutional.
- More State News Headlines
-
EVENING UPDATE: Supreme Court: Lawmakers to run in old districts


